Linux Mint makes Ubuntu suck less
The most of the best and the market dominant Linux distributions have one in thing in common – they have strong commercial support behind them. This applies to Ubuntu (Canonical), Fedora (RedHat), openSUSE (Novell). Debian is an exception as it is driven by a major non-profit organization. On the other hand, every now and then an interesting smaller distribution comes up and is able to attract major audiences and gain an active user group. Such distributions include SimplyMEPIS, PCLinuxOS and the LinuxMint. However the recent history has proved that these small distros, that often are too dependent on a single contributor, tend to fall into problems on the long run. Mepis used to be a very good and competitive distribution, but as the founder failed to develop a business model around it the distro is now rapidly fading away. Same fate is is now threating the PCLinuxOS as well, as it seems to have stalled in development and maintenance. For this reason these distributions are somewhat of a risky investment for anyone considering them for anything more serious than just surfing at home. Linux Mint however is trying hard to be different – they have a couple of years of solid track record of releasing new versions, they are showing constant improvement and they seem to be pushing hard in order to become serious player on the free Linux market.
So what does Mint have so special that it has been able to gather a major userbase and an active community? The trick is that Mint strikes hard to the weak spots of Ubuntu, while relying on it’s solid base and maintaining binary compatibility. The improvements that the Mint developers have made are obvious from the first boot into the system – Linux Mint makes the Ubuntu suck a whole lot less.
First of all Mint fixes the ugly desktop theming that Ubuntu is often criticized for. You can’t find a single pixel of the original Ubuntu brown/orange looks in Mint. Instead you are greeted with a rather conservative but pleasant grey/black theme with pastel green highlights. The Gnome interface has been rearranged to a single bottom panel, which is definitely easier to consume by people migrating from Windows. The original Gnome menus have been replaced with a Mint menu, which is somewhat of a mix-up in between openSUSE Kickoff and a traditional Windows XP style menu arrangement. With these changes Mint is very easy to use and welcoming for people with little experience on various Linux desktops.
Another feature which is welcomed by new Linux users is the inclusion of most critical proprietary software elements that one needs for everyday basic usage. These include Sun Java, Adobe Flash and support for a number of proprietary audio and video formats. This means that a vast majority of the world’s top web pages and services work out of the box and so do your music and video files too. Mint also introduces a set of small Mint-specific tools like the MintUpload FTP client and a slightly different package update manager. However, my gut feeling is that the importance of these little tools is a lot smaller in comparison to the out-of-the-box confifuration done right. While the Linux hardcore always remind me that you can customize Linux to be whatever you want, I’d still say that more than 95% of people settle to what ever is shown after the first boot. They may change the wallpaper but thats about it and that’s why the first impression is most important.
While Linux Mint seems to be targeted for the newbies by design, I have to say it has the weirdest start-up wizard popping up of the first post-install boot. Yes, the first things that Mint asks for the user after installation are 1) Should the root account be enabled/disabled 2) Should there be fortune cookies shon in the terminal. I really can’t decide whether to cry or laugh when I see these questions on my laptop screen. The root account issue is obviously a very important one, but does the 1st time Linux user know anything about the significance of using ’sudo’ or ’su’? The fortune cookies on the other hand are the most insignificant feature ever in an operating system – fine, if the Mint developers like them, so put them in your distro. If not, then get rid of them, but why on earth you have to bug the new users with such a stupid question? Oh well, I guess no distro is perfect.
Overall it is safe to say that Mint delivers a lot of added value on top of Ubuntu. It looks better, feels better and sounds better on your tongue. It offers one of the very best out-of-the-box experiences on the market, while relying on the stable Ubuntu/Debian core. I been watching the website, releases and the community every now and then, at so far it has been making a good progress release after release. The Alexa statistics graph below gives you an idea how it matches up against the contenders (click on the graph for more details). Mint is definitely one project to keep on eye on in the future, and let’s hope that it doesn’t fade away as the years go by.
Find out more about Mint at: http://www.linuxmint.com













November 16th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
I`am a complete linux n00b “i was an expert on windows tho (;” i have just started to experiment with linux looking at all the differnt distros etc, i`am just about to install mint i have tried opensuse had problems with my network connection, then had ubuntu installed everything ran fine, now i want to try mint, hopefully everything runs well and i will be more than happy to leave ms windows for good.
On another note i was thinking to myself when looking at and installing all the differnt flavors of linux what the h3ll was i paying microsucks hundred of pounds for when there are clean open source operating systems and software out on the internets from linux.
Thankyou to linux dev teams, help and support peeps, and free open source software developers.
October 26th, 2009 at 6:11 pm
I get mail when a comment is added here so I just checked in
Peter it’s sad that you leave a comment when you are blatantly ignorant
Mint has “all” codecs installed – steal them??? What utter nonsense – you can’t
Yes Mint lags behind Ubuntu in releases – that’s because we base Mint on Ubuntu (thank you Ubuntu)
As for lagging community support that’s your opinion
October 23rd, 2009 at 9:44 am
Linux mint dosen’t have all the coedc drivers you need, you will still have to pay for them, or steal them your choice.
To get the same drivers in Ubuntu just download the restricted drivers its in Synaptic.
Mint lags behind Ubuntu in updates, releases, and community support.
The only advantage is it looks nice and has java pre-installed also in your synaptic for download.
October 4th, 2009 at 6:53 am
Jonathan – You can delete the standard Mint Menu, right-click on the panel, and select “Add to Panel.” From there, you have the choice of adding the standard GNOME menu or the GNOME custom bar.
At any rate, I totally agree with this review. I was using Windows XP, because Vista is a disaster, and Ubuntu was just… incomplete. I didn’t mind that it was ugly. I didn’t mind that it “wasn’t Windows.” But half the packages didn’t work, it had major compatibility issues, and it just generally felt a bit sloppily put together. I’m not totally computer illiterate, but I’m no guru either. If I have to, I can fix a lot of this stuff, but for a distro that claims to be “Linux for the common man,” I shouldn’t have to spend hours, days, even weeks fixing everything that doesn’t work when it should.
I gave it 4 months, and just couldn’t get it to work to any acceptable level of simplicity or logic. So I abandoned it, and grudgingly went back to XP.
And then I found Mint. I was sceptical after what a tremendous failure Ubuntu had turned out to be for me, but I tried it.
And it rocks. It rocked HARD.
Everything works as it should, it’s fast, complete, better-looking, and just all-around a huge step up from Ubuntu. I love it. I’m never using Windows again.
April 25th, 2009 at 9:22 pm
Question.. I have a Del Latitude D600, 250GB HDD, and 2GB Ram. everything else is standard.. which would be better for it? Linux Mint or Ubuntu? And where can I get the drivers? Mint recognizes that I have a wireless card, but it only attempts to instal the driver and it gives me an alert message of nothing but on OK button… Help? waramoore@yahoo.com if you have suguestions. please. any help would be amazing.. I got rid of all my Windows Bootdisks, and have Ubuntu, Knoppix, and Mint and trying to find a version of Mac OSX.
April 21st, 2009 at 11:12 pm
Good review mint is one of my favorite distros.Agreed Dick Gentry ubuntu installs get worse and worse or it seems that way to me.Hardy was my last full venture into ubuntu and let me tell you what a pain.there were so many problems I could not even use it for a month and a half till they had updates to correct the problems.Testing jaunty now just to see how things are going.worst video performance so far on my box well scratch that 8.10 gave me the black screen of death. stick with mint and save your time and brain cells.Funny thing with hardy I tested from a late alfa to beta to rc no trouble running it, update to the official release full of bugs. waste of my time if I was to keep it as my main os.I keep it on this box because it’s lts which means I’m curios to see if they ever fix it totally or even reasonably close to what ubuntu use to be
February 9th, 2009 at 11:35 pm
As a user of both Linux Mint and Ubuntu, I’d like to thank you for your review-I’m still pretty much a Linux “newb”, but I started off from nothing with Ubuntu and it took me a minute and a bit of Googling to get past restricted drivers, different universes, etc. Linux Mint was a different experience upon installation (I didn’t have a problem with the Root issue, for instance-I’m a newb but not that much of one)-it was a great time.
I use both it and Ubuntu 8.04 on a daily basis (Mint on a laptop, Ubuntu on my desktop) and now I’ve got both straightened out-but Mint was quite a bit easier.
Actually, my only “problem” with Mint (I put quotations around it because it’s not a problem at all, just an aesthetics issue) is that I would actually prefer to have the standard Gnome menus as opposed to the one bottom corner OpenSUSE/Windows XP style one…not that I can’t work with it, or see its advantages, I’d just rather have the Gnome style.
Oh, and on further aesthetics comments-I’ve actually themed the Linux Mint box much more than I’ve themed the Ubuntu box (Ubuntu had been kept to just installing the Dust theme and a revised-but-still-mostly-the-same version of the wallpaper, while I have about 14 different non-included themes, some of which I’ve pieced together myself, for the Mint) but that’s probably just a function of the laptop hanging out with me on the couch when I’m bored.
February 5th, 2009 at 3:22 pm
I just read this and feel I must comment on
“the weirdest start-up wizard popping up of the first post-install boot. ”
I agree – it is a bit weird
The reason is that there was more included when it was introduced, but that had to be pulled out because of some problems I’ve forgotten. And the intention is to use it for more things in the future so it’s a bit unfinished right now