<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu&#8217;s Intermediate Ibex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bitburners.com/articles/ubuntus-intermediate-ibex/4255/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bitburners.com/articles/ubuntus-intermediate-ibex/4255/</link>
	<description>We Burn a Bit!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:11:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope feels rushed and premature &#124; BitBurners.com</title>
		<link>http://www.bitburners.com/articles/ubuntus-intermediate-ibex/4255/comment-page-1/#comment-12470</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope feels rushed and premature &#124; BitBurners.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 11:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitburners.com/?p=4255#comment-12470</guid>
		<description>[...] creature Jackalope. Ubuntu&#8217;s latest tries to bring some innovation to the table, after the intermediate Ibex, but unfortunately it doesn&#8217;t feel ready from day one. Ever since Mark Shuttleworth said that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] creature Jackalope. Ubuntu&#8217;s latest tries to bring some innovation to the table, after the intermediate Ibex, but unfortunately it doesn&#8217;t feel ready from day one. Ever since Mark Shuttleworth said that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lefty.crupps</title>
		<link>http://www.bitburners.com/articles/ubuntus-intermediate-ibex/4255/comment-page-1/#comment-12149</link>
		<dc:creator>lefty.crupps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitburners.com/?p=4255#comment-12149</guid>
		<description>&gt; just type anything in google and what comes up
&gt; is always …ubuntuforums.org…
... with incomplete &quot;answers&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; just type anything in google and what comes up<br />
&gt; is always …ubuntuforums.org…<br />
&#8230; with incomplete &#8220;answers&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: none</title>
		<link>http://www.bitburners.com/articles/ubuntus-intermediate-ibex/4255/comment-page-1/#comment-12133</link>
		<dc:creator>none</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 04:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitburners.com/?p=4255#comment-12133</guid>
		<description>Ubuntu’s Ibex is the ugliest desktop I&#039;ve ever seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ubuntu’s Ibex is the ugliest desktop I&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ljpp</title>
		<link>http://www.bitburners.com/articles/ubuntus-intermediate-ibex/4255/comment-page-1/#comment-11827</link>
		<dc:creator>ljpp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitburners.com/?p=4255#comment-11827</guid>
		<description>Interestingly this article has become a hot topic at Digg:
http://digg.com/linux_unix/Ubuntu_s_Intermediate_Ibex

It appears that majority of people seem to concur on my opinion about this Ubuntu release, so at least I am not alone with my thoughts. And I didn&#039;t even need to call Digg users &quot;wanking walruses&quot; to get there :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly this article has become a hot topic at Digg:<br />
<a href="http://digg.com/linux_unix/Ubuntu_s_Intermediate_Ibex" rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/linux_unix/Ubuntu_s_Intermediate_Ibex</a></p>
<p>It appears that majority of people seem to concur on my opinion about this Ubuntu release, so at least I am not alone with my thoughts. And I didn&#8217;t even need to call Digg users &#8220;wanking walruses&#8221; to get there :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fab</title>
		<link>http://www.bitburners.com/articles/ubuntus-intermediate-ibex/4255/comment-page-1/#comment-11747</link>
		<dc:creator>fab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitburners.com/?p=4255#comment-11747</guid>
		<description>first article in years where i totally agree!!! there&#039;s not more to say as it reflects my exact opinion! but it&#039;s still an opinion. i also think it&#039;s the worst looking mainstream distro, but apparently they have success with it. so there must be something that makes this distribution more popular than others. obviously not looks, but...CANONICAL! which started doing the same as Apple. advertisement, public presence etc is the key! and for me, the community which makes it possible to resolve an issue (just type anything in google and what comes up is always ...ubuntuforums.org...) 

there lots of bugs in 8.10 which i did not experience in 8.04, so basically i prefer they fix these things until 9.04 and then add the new looks! the network manager with integrated GSM/3G is a good idea but not working in my case, crashes and package management is still very betaish. i prefer canonical to fix those problems and add a new fresh look and advertise it as something new! the risk of adding many new features in a distro and a totally new look would make it prone to criticism and lots of people would turn away. make it a very, but really very stable operating system with some nice tweaks and add-ons (not bleeding edge) and then the looks! that&#039;s success...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first article in years where i totally agree!!! there&#8217;s not more to say as it reflects my exact opinion! but it&#8217;s still an opinion. i also think it&#8217;s the worst looking mainstream distro, but apparently they have success with it. so there must be something that makes this distribution more popular than others. obviously not looks, but&#8230;CANONICAL! which started doing the same as Apple. advertisement, public presence etc is the key! and for me, the community which makes it possible to resolve an issue (just type anything in google and what comes up is always &#8230;ubuntuforums.org&#8230;) </p>
<p>there lots of bugs in 8.10 which i did not experience in 8.04, so basically i prefer they fix these things until 9.04 and then add the new looks! the network manager with integrated GSM/3G is a good idea but not working in my case, crashes and package management is still very betaish. i prefer canonical to fix those problems and add a new fresh look and advertise it as something new! the risk of adding many new features in a distro and a totally new look would make it prone to criticism and lots of people would turn away. make it a very, but really very stable operating system with some nice tweaks and add-ons (not bleeding edge) and then the looks! that&#8217;s success&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubertakter</title>
		<link>http://www.bitburners.com/articles/ubuntus-intermediate-ibex/4255/comment-page-1/#comment-11737</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubertakter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bitburners.com/?p=4255#comment-11737</guid>
		<description>If you are looking for a different window manager, then download Kubuntu, or install KDE 4.1 over normal Ubuntu (I&#039;m not sure how well that would work).  Anyway, I&#039;ve played around with Kubuntu with KDE 4.1 and it looks pretty cool.  Ultimately I prefer Gnome, at least at work, because it is such a clean and sparse interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are looking for a different window manager, then download Kubuntu, or install KDE 4.1 over normal Ubuntu (I&#8217;m not sure how well that would work).  Anyway, I&#8217;ve played around with Kubuntu with KDE 4.1 and it looks pretty cool.  Ultimately I prefer Gnome, at least at work, because it is such a clean and sparse interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
